Post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory in the music of Wagner

Thomas Roeder
School of Art, Chico State University

Susan U. Slim
Department of Dance, Harvard University

1. Wagner and feminism

Though Solie stated, "sexuality is part of the failure of physicality," recent works by Clemmens[1] demonstrate that in a way, sexuality is not part of the failure of physicality, but it is instead the sensitivity, and eventually the collapse, of sexuality that is part of the failure of physicality. The idea has historical precedent: In a larger sense, McClary uses the term "Wagnerist Leitmotiv" to denote the role of the musician as composer. (My publications about modernist cryptographicist theory promote a discipline of difference in the Strausian-proto-prolongationist mode--not to say we should attempt it.) Thus Wagner uses the term "the experimentalist concepts of music" to denote the common ground between society and musical form. The genius, or rather futility, is also evident in bars 2-13 of Muhly's I Drink the Air Before Me (contra Exner [2]) in mm. 12-32, 259-272, and hinted at in 90-103, also in a few compositions of Haydn.

In the works of Cage, the most important concept is the distinction between Other and self. Narrative's reinventing of sexuality vis-a-vis physicality, and insistence on voicing the music intrinsic to sexuality vis-a-vis physicality, enforces post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory. The experimentalist concepts of music holds that culture may be used to respell homophobia. Would, even might, modernist cryptographicist theory (standing up to so-called "scientific" "Schenkerian" experimentalist concepts of music) distort, or one could argue conflate, subcultures, conversely surprisingly seeking only to escape the hermeneutic narrative? The solution is absurd. It could be said that my auto-ethnographical publications relating to the textual construction of context found that a statement like "truth, perhaps usefully, has hints of real worth" cannot exist. The listener has a choice: (a) accept Bloom's essay on modernist cryptographicist theory and reflexively accept that the goal of the critic is prolongation, given that Marx's analysis of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory is valid, or (b) accept Lewin's model of modernist cryptographicist theory.

"We must marginalize music before we restate music." So wrote Solie (echoing Straus) in chapter 2 of "Musicology and Difference"--not to insist we shouldn't try. However, if proto-cryptographicist minimalism is true, we have to decide between the experimentalist concepts of music and modernist cryptographicist theory. Although outdated perceptions of compositions attempt to reinforce masculine language, the contributions of multicultural thinkers, on the contrary, rehear language and empower feminine language, envoicing the experimentalist concepts of music. (Heidegger's critique of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory holds that ethnomusicology is memory.)

In the works of Cage, the most important concept is the defining of modernist politics. The idea has precedent: But any number of theories about a self-justifying whole may be found, and every one can be reiterated in turn. In a sense, as an example, Wagner uses the term "post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory" to denote the role of the analyst as musicologist/composer. But when must Beyonce, hampered by the sexual analysis, respell post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory? Derrida promotes the use of the romantic ideal of listening to problematize the musicologist.

The liberal/conservative distinction which is a central argument of Cage's "Empty Words" emerges further in "A Distressing Incident: Choirboys, Canons, and Homosexuality". In a larger sense, the object is situated into a modernist cryptographicist theory that encompasses disability within a totality. The pigeonholing, or as some might say insider, "scientific" stasis, can be heard in measures 198-203 of Zorn's Forbidden Fruit throughout bars 195-200 and 176-205. The theme of the works of Cage is quasi, pre-, and de-ambiguity. My own investigations concerning the role of the composer as listener per se suggest a scholarship of identity in the McClaryian-compositionist vein (the Riemannist resonances of this statement are absurd).

Thus musicology's analyzing of society affirms the experimentalist concepts of music. It could be said that though elitist hierarchies entrench archaic, fixed performance, interdisciplinary scholars read past performance and prosper by enriching postmodern performance, upholding the bystander. Nevertheless for whom should the stage--fleeing post-textual rationalist performance--obscure, even fulfill, sexuality vis-a-vis ambiguity, itself paradoxically defined by "triadic" proto-urbanist canon? But the (ethno-)musicologist-artist has a paradox: one can reject Cusick's essay on the experimentalist concepts of music and subsequently be complicit in that music, somewhat ironically, has intrinsic meaning or, alternatively, one can accept Shaw's monograph on the experimentalist concepts of music and reflexively reject that composition is a product of notated music, but only if Abbate's model of voicelessness is to be believed; if that is not the case, history may be used to privilege otherwise experimental diverse actors.

In a sense, Hamilton[3] implies that we have to pick between the experimentalist concepts of music and modernist cryptographicist theory. (The premise of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory states that physicality is capable of intention.) The performer is manifested into a open work that includes culture as a whole. Several proto-appropriations relating to the experimentalist concepts of music cannot be uncovered, each of which Roeder reenacts individually [4].

Hence Cusick promotes the use of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory to analyse politics. E.g., Cusick uses the term "modernist cryptographicist theory" to denote the modulation, and subsequent economy, of meta-semiotic society. It could be said that Rodin[5] holds that we have to choose between romantic quasitextual theory and "lowbrow" post-romanticism. The absurdity, or rather dialectic, can be felt in mm. 140-159 of Bjork's Hunter, although rather cursorily in measures 90-110 and paraphrased in 299-327 (also foreshadowed in embryonic form throughout the works of Rousseau).

Yet how might the disabled read the participant? My previous discoveries relating to the mediation between music and truth revealed that a statement like "the task of the observer is progression" cannot exist. The example of the experimentalist concepts of music prevalent in Wagner's "Goetterdammerung" is also evident in "Rheingold" (contra Cage [6]).

2. Modernist cryptographicist theory and "scientific" performance

"Society is fictionalized," says Solie. However, where modes of exclusions seek to reinforce uncritical disability, the contributions of LGBTQ persons rehear disability and foreground ambiguous disability, bolstering post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory. In a sense, the main theme of Rivera's[7] analysis of the experimentalist concepts of music is neither ambiguity, nor inter-ambiguity, but rather all-too-ambiguity. Adorno suggests the use of the so-called cultural concept of performance to challenge hierarchy.

"Composition is used in the service of the musicologist," emphasizes Brett; however, according to Adorno[8] , it is not so much composition that is used in the service of the musicologist, but instead the genius, and eventually the obligation, of composition. (Adorno uses the term "post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory" to denote a redundant worth system.) Thus analysis's situating of society, and insistence instead on hearing the musical structure of society, enforces "scientific" performance. The musicologist has a paradox: either accept Solomon's model of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory or, on the other hand, reject Wagner's critique of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory. However, the experimentalist concepts of music suggests that music is created by our worth-system, but only if memory is roughly equivalent to performance.

When the critic investigates "scientific" performance, she is confronted by a choice: one can accept post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory or one can conclude that ambiguity is used to negate the Other. In a larger sense, the subject is restated into a "ecomusicological" bimusicalist theory that merges language with a paradox. It could be said that my publications about structuralist canon suggest a music theory of remorse in the Marxian-compositionist style (not to be confused with the sub-material concept of context). Expression's empowering of culture espouses romantic minimalism. This sensitivity emerges yet stronger in bars 119-144 of Glass's Koyaanisqatsi in mm. 206-211, 51-61, and (in retrograde) in 41-50.

"Fifth Symphony" indexes Western dyads in the places where Ueno's "Entropy of Cigarette Butts Across the Universe" condemns World triads. Nevertheless for whom should "scientific" performance (a bit constrained by the surrealist queer experimentalist concepts of music) contextualize, or some would argue distort, the status quo: which also is a bit constrained by the surrealist queer experimentalist concepts of music? The solution is unmistakable. Many sites for theories concerning the defining characteristic of cultural music are, perhaps paradoxically, discovered. (If post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory is true, we have to pick between disability musicology and "scientific" performance.)

Ergo, Kramer suggests the use of post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory to analyse sexuality. The characteristic focus of the works of Mahler is the role of the performer/analyst as composer. But though outdated canons respell capitalist physicality vis-a-vis history, ethnomusicological approaches, perhaps surprisingly, attack physicality vis-a-vis history and overcome by promoting Marxist physicality vis-a-vis history, amplifying diverse actors. (Planchart[9]) The object is manifested into a modernist hermeneuticist theory that encompasses disability within a entity. McClary's critique of new musicology implies that musical form is art, but only if truth is in binary opposition to politics; if that is not the case, one can assume that society has significance. As an example, Kramer uses the term "the experimentalist concepts of music" to denote not, in fact, composition, but super-composition.

The (ethno-)musicologist has a dilemma: either reject Hume's monograph on "scientific" performance and rightly be complicit in that the stage is capable of content or, on the contrary, accept Dell'Antonio's essay on "scientific" performance. In a larger sense, listening's voicing of music, and insistence rather on decoding the society intrinsic to music, contrasts the experimentalist concepts of music. In a sense, my prior thoughts relating to post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory found that a statement like "the purpose of the listener is clear depiction" cannot be uncovered (the Reichist overtones of the philosophy are absurd). Therefore the idea characterizing Clark's[10] analysis of the experimentalist concepts of music is the difference between ambiguity and composition.

The newness, or as some might say modern collapse, quotes bars 182-203 of Radiohead's O.K. Computer, albeit in a "clandestine" mode, and again throughout measures 113-132 and inverted in 215-222. But can women--defined by a textual deconstructionist post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory--reinforce, we must write conflate and even marginalize, Abbateist voicelessness? (For instance, Abbate uses the term ""scientific" performance" to denote a redundant totality.) If the experimentalist concepts of music be false, the works of Mahler are postmodern. Several proto-constructions concerning not narrative, as "highbrow" performance suggests, but pre-narrative persist.

In sum, it is obvious that the connections among the experimentalist concepts of music, post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory, and "scientific" performance, to say nothing of rationalist inter-"scientific" theory, which will be the topic of our upcoming essay, are moving in the direction of a nationalist goal. Increased study of Mahler's works, especially the Fourth Symphony, in the context of Chengist musicology of caring and the artist per se's cultural composition will be the sky to artistic comment.


1. Clemmens, S. B. (2016) The experimentalist concepts of music in the works of Cage. Edward Mellyn Press

2. Exner, Seda ed. (1971) Deconstructing Marxism: Post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory and the experimentalist concepts of music. McGraw Hill

3. Hamilton, V. Z. (1977) Art, scholarship, and musical form: Post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory in the works of Wagner. Scarecrow Press

4. Roeder, Hans (2014) Serialism, the experimentalist concepts of music, and conceptualist self-theorizing. University of Chicago Press

5. Rodin, Q. ed. (1882) The Expression of Paradigm: The experimentalist concepts of music in the works of Puri. Columbia University Press

6. Cage, Lindsay ed./trans. (2013) The experimentalist concepts of music and post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory. McGraw Hill

7. Rivera, E. (2005) Narratives of Failure: The experimentalist concepts of music in the music of Crawford. W.W. Norton

8. Adorno, Elina (1994) Serialism, the experimentalist concepts of music, and Mahler. M.I.T. Press

9. Planchart, P. (1991) The Stasis of Scholarship: Post-Schenkerianist trans-cultural theory without the experimentalist concepts of music. University of Michigan Press

10. Clark, Anna ed. (1960) The experimentalist concepts of music in the music of Lady Gaga. Princeton University Press

Automatic bad new musicology paper generator: based on the Postmodernist essay generator and the Dada engine.

 

In the further interest of self-parody, I am starting work on an Old Musicology random essay generator; please email me with ideas. All I know is that every paper will begin "On f. 3v, a new watermark ..." etc.